May
18

Student Strike at University of Puerto Rico Enters 28th Day

Democracy Now! :

In Puerto Rico, an ongoing strike by students at the University of Puerto Rico is coming to a head. Riot police have surrounded the main gates of the university’s main campus and are trying to break the strike by denying food and water to students who have occupied the campus inside. The strike began nearly four weeks ago in response to budget cuts at the university of more than $100 million. On Thursday, a mass assembly of more than 3,000 students voted overwhelmingly to continue the strike. The next day, riot police seized control of the main campus gates. We go now to Puerto Rico, inside the occupied campus at the university.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/5/17/student_strike_at_university_of_puerto

Global Voices :
http://globalvoicesonline.org/2010/05/14/puerto-rico-tensions-arise-at-the-student-strike/

Student Activism :
http://studentactivism.net/2010/05/17/university-of-puerto-rico-siege-drags-on-general-strike-planned-for-tuesday/

Socialist Worker :
http://socialistworker.org/2010/05/18/turning-point-in-upr-strike

Pan-African News Wire :
http://panafricannews.blogspot.com/2010/05/puerto-rico-students-strike-to-save.html

Solidarity :
http://www.solidarity-us.org/current/node/2812

Feb
16

Board of Operations Report Advises Against Student Democracy!

STUDENTS ARE TO BE SILENCED AND KEPT UNINFORMED!!!

The DSU Board of Operations report advises that students should not be democratically involved in corporate contract deals signed on their behalf and ignores principles of informed competition and consumption.

Go HERE to find your Councillors’ email address and let them know that you do not want to be silenced on this issue, that as a member of this union you have a right to be informed and to be allowed to make your own decisions.

————————————————————————————————————

HERE ARE SOME OTHER POSSIBILITIES ALREADY OPERATING ELSEWHERE IN CANADA

To properly judge whether these could be better options at Dalhousie, however, we must first be permitted to compare them to our own context!

Also let the DSU Sustainability Office know that obstacles to student democracy and empowerment are also obstacles to implementing more sustainable entrepreneurial models on campus!

——————————————————————————————

The DSU Board of Operations has delivered its report this week to be reviewed by DSU Council before voting on a motion about whether or not students should be permitted to vote on the matter of secret contracts signed with service providers in the SUB.

Presently, our DSU representatives sign contracts with food and beverage providers Sodexo and Pepsi, without student consultation, giving these companies exclusivity rights in the SUB, and including clauses in the contracts that prevent students (on who’s behalf the contracts are signed) from seeing the contracts and judging for themselves if they are worth signing onto or not.

SMAC has learned that the report advises against the motion, and that after consultation with several businesses ”All responses included concerns that this motion would allow competitors to have access to their trade secrets of the business and these would then be open to competitors.”

And yet, how are we as consumers and clients of these businesses, expected to make informed decisions about the choices available to use if we are not allowed to examine the details of the engagements that we are entered into? How are we expected to make informed decisions, and to be protected consumers, when making decisions about the options available to us without access to comparative information?

Remember also, that the motion to be voted on is not about secret contracts, but about allowing students to voice their own opinions about secret contracts. The report therefore advises against student participation in decisions that affect their daily lives on campus, that students be silenced, and that decisions made on their behalf be kept behind closed doors.

SMAC wonders also if consultations have been undertaken with stakeholders other than businesses. Have student unions elsewhere been consulted? Have students and university staff operating different food provision models been consulted?

SMAC has researched other models of food provisions at other Canadian campuses, but cannot compare their benefits and drawbacks to our own situation until we are all collectively allowed as members of our union to analyze the benefits and drawbacks of the operations on our own campus.


Feb
11

CAF and SMU on CKDU

Asaf Rashid, host of From the Margins on CKDU 88.1 FM community radio, has interviewed students present at the last Campus Action on Food (CAF) serving on February 2.

CAF has, over the last several months, been organizing free food servings in the SUB lobby thus defying the exclusivity contract signed between the DSU and Sodexo. Asaf interviews students taking advantage of the free food, members of CAF, as well as Chris Stroud, a representative of the progressive student coalition at Saint-Mary’s University currently undergoing a large campaign challenging corporate food provision on their campus.

To download the series of interviews, go to www.ckdu.ca, select “Program Archives” from the menu on the left, enter the airing time provided below and click “download.” Note that older segments will not be available on hi-fi (128 kbps). You will need to access them through the lo-fi (32 kbps) selection form.

Monday, February 8, 20:04 - 20:17

Feb
07

DSU offers CAF an Ultimatum!

For the past several months, Campus Action on Food (CAF), an NSPIRG working group, has been offering free vegetarian and locally sourced food servings to students within the SUB. This however, has been met with much concern from DSU representatives who have threatened to have CAF expulsed from the SUB.

On Feb 2, during CAF’s latest food serving, the following memo was handed to CAF:

—————————————————————–

MEMORANDUM

Date: Feb 2, 2010
For: Campus Action on Food (CAF)
From: Dalhousie Student Union

The Dalhousie Student Union recognizes CAF’s desire to provide free and healthy vegan food options on campus. The DSU does however, want to ensure that the health and safety of its members and those who enter its building are paramount.

Representatives of the DSU have met with the Union’s current food service providers and it has been agreed upon by all parties that CAF will be permitted to provide its services in the DSU on a weekly trial basis between now and April 30, 2010, subject to the following:

Terms and Conditions

1. The student group prepares and serves food in the Dalhousie Student Union Building in a manner that adheres to all of the regulations deemed necessary by the Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture for the safe preparation, transportation and serving of food products. Food distribution may occur only upon inspection and approval by the appropriate Food Safety Inspector.

2. The student group is required to become a ratified society of the DSU. This free process is a necessary safeguard to guarantee that certain individuals are willing to take on-going accountability for ensuring that all conditions outlined above are met.

3. As part of this agreement the student group will refrain from handing out any form of propaganda while in the Student Union Building that potentially damages the reputation and business of any service providers that the DSU currently has relations with.

—————————————————————–

This is a clear example of DSU representatives wanting to look like the conceding “good guys” all the while attempting to silence the voice of students within their own building in favour of corporate clients with whom contracts have been engaged without student consultation.

1. Several members of CAF have followed food safety courses, and all meals are prepared at the Dal Women’s Centre kitchen. No meat is ever involved, and most often no animal products at all.

2. CAF, as an NSPIRG working group, is a ratified society.

3. The so-called “propaganda” made available to students during food servings is no more than promotional materials from CAF and SMAC as well as general information on the undemocratic behaviour of DSU representatives, the ecologically unsound practices of corporate food providers, and the impediments both represent to student self-determining - all of which is regularly published, in much more detail in The Gazette available throughout the SUB.

Feb
05

Food Contract Debates Featured on CKDU 88.1 FM

David Parker, host of Operation Wake Up! on CKDU 88.1 FM community radio, has been featuring the food contract debates happening on Dalhousie Campus.

To download the series of interviews, go to www.ckdu.ca, select “Program Archives” from the menu on the left, enter the airing time provided below and click “download.” Note that older segments will not be available on hi-fi (128 kbps). You will need to access them through the lo-fi (32 kbps) selection form.

Friday, January 15, 12:08 - 12:21
Shannon Zimmerman - President, Dalhousie Student Union

Friday, January 22, 12:39 - 12:50
Zhindra Gillis, Engineering Representative, Dalhousie Student Union Council

Friday, February 5, 8:17 - 8:57
Glenn Blake, Senate Representative, Dalhousie Student Union Council
Sonia Grant, member of Campus Action on Food (CAF)
Sebastien Labelle, member of Students Mobilizing for Action on Campus (SMAC)

Jan
28

Board of Operations Report Delayed

SMAC was just informed that the DSU Board of Operations will not meet its deadline for delivering its report examining the impacts of refusing to sign future confidentiality agreements with contractors.

This means council will not be voting on the motion on Feb 3 as planned.

The reasons given for the delay were that the board is still waiting for a letter to be submitted by the lawyer with whom they’ve been consulting, and that they also wish to do further investigation.

SMAC will update you on developments as they come. Until then continue to voice your concerns to council. Let them know this is an issue you care about and needs to be dealt with!

Again, the board’s report should not sway Council away from a vote supporting an open debate on the issue. All students should have a voice!

For more information, see the previous post and go to the Contracts Campaign tab above.

Jan
21

Secret contracts motion sent to the Board of Operations

Keep the pressure. Demand democracy. Send you councillors an email! Follow this link for a new template letter

Contracts signed on behalf of students should not be hidden from them!

Students Mobilize for Action on Campus (SMAC) collected over 1500 signatures to petition the DSU to stop signing secret contracts and allow students the freedom to access contracts which are signed on our behalf.

Then you, members of the student body, emailed DSU councillors, voicing your concern about this issue. You let your councillor know that you want a transparent and accountable union which allows for student engagement and debate on issues such as corporate contracts and confidentiality. Councillors were urged to send the question of secret contracts to a general vote, letting students decide whether or not our union should sign onto secret contracts in the future.

On December 2, the DSU council decided that it wants more information before it decides whether to let us, union members, have a vote in the decision. The motion to end secret contracts has now been sent to the Board of Operations for further analysis. The BoO will examine the financial and legal repercussions of engaging, or not engaging, in confidential contracts with corporations. Then, using this speculative information, the Council will vote on whether or not they will allow students to vote on the question of signing secret contracts.

While it is valid to ask for more research into this issue, it is important to consider what kind of questions the Board of Operations will be asking, as well as what kind of relevant conclusions can be made. With our proposed secret contracts motion, we are asking the DSU to cease signing any future contracts containing confidentiality agreements. Therefore, any findings that the Board releases are entirely speculative. While the Board of Operations is likely to argue that not signing onto confidential agreements with corporations will limit the University’s competitive edge and thereby making exclusive contracts less lucrative, this argument is only hypothetical. As a University filled with thirsty and hungry students, Dalhousie will still offer a substantial market to corporations and still hold bargaining power. Furthermore, exclusivity contracts are not something which the student body should want to engage in considering the ethical and environmental implication of supporting multinational corporations and the ways in which doing so squashes local businesses, opportunities for variety, and the potential for student led programs. In any case, discussion about exclusive contracts can only be fairly argued once they cease to be confidential and the details made available to students on who’s behalf they were signed.

Ultimately, the Board of Operation’s report should not dissuade Council to allow students to vote on the issue of secret contracts. This is still a decision which needs to be made by the whole student body. Demanding transparency, accountability, and an open debate for student members is a principled position, and an economic cost/benefit analysis should not override this important principle. The point is that we, the students of Dalhousie, want to be part of a union that is open, honest, and accountable. Not engaging in confidential agreements furthers this end.

If you would like to email your Councillor and express your continued desire to see the secret contracts motion brought to a vote please click here to view a template letter and list of Councillor’s email addresses.

Nov
27

You’ve raised your voice against secret contracts… now it’s time to make the DSU council listen!

Follow this link to know how to contact your councillor

Students Mobilize for Action on Campus (SMAC) collected over 1500 signatures to petition the DSU to stop signing secret contracts and allow union members the freedom to access the contracts signed on our behalf.

We believe that our union deserves a culture of openness and accountability. Secret contracts shut down meaningful debate and dialogue about food and beverage issues on campus. We want students to be more engaged on the vital issues.

Soon the DSU council will decide whether to allow students to vote on this issue at the next DSU general meeting or to ignore the voices of the union membership.

Don’t let the DSU council deprive all students of our democratic right to vote on this matter.  Tell your councillor to send this motion to the next general meeting for all students to decide!

What secret contracts, what is this about?


Nov
22

Social movements still worth building

Ten years later, Seattle protests should be remembered for hope not defeat.

http://www.dalgazette.com/?p=694

Nov
22

As UC Regents Approve Major Tuition Hike, Students, Faculty Decry Erosion of Public Education in CA and Nationwide

Amid thousands of student protesters and armed police standing guard, the University of California’s Board of Regents has approved a 32 percent increase in student fees.

Democracy Now
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/20/students

LA Times
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-uc21-2009nov21,0,1334635.story

AFP
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jEIwDer2BxXtFipmnIaOR43_RoUA